Why men don’t last:Self- Destruction as a Way of Life

1. Read “Why men don’t last:Self- Destruction as a Way of Life” in the attachments.
Click here to get this or any other assignment done for you at profoundessaywriters.com

Answer Question a-f  each question’s solution need in each paragraph (total 6 paragraph)

Don’t summary the essay, just focus on each question, the answer can find in each essay and use your knowledge to answer it, place each question to each paragraph.

a. Angier uses several categories of division in this piece: ?so good and so bad? habits of ? Everyman?(paragraph 3); the self-destructive habits and rates of men versus women (throughout); the division between the rugged individual versus the egalitarian help meet roles today?s men are expected to pay(paragraph 23-25). Why do such divisions enable readers to clearly recognize similarities as well as differences? 

b.     Angier?s explanations for these divisions are equally divided. What evidence does she offer to support the ?crude evolutionary hypothesis? that ?men are natural risk-takers, given to showy display of bravado, aggression and daring all for the sake of attracting a harem of mates? (11)? What evidence does she offer to contradict this hypothesis? 

c.      What might be some reasons why women talk about committing suicide more than men do, but that men actually have a higher rate of suicide than women do (16-19)?

d.  What are the dangers and difficulties of categorizing behavior by gender? Why aren?t the divisions and classifications Angier uses more clear-cut? Is this a phenomenon of the research she cites, of her writing, of the way things are in real life, or of some combination of the three? 

 e. Angier is writing as a reporter of other people?s research. Do we know where she stands on the subject- which hypothesis for men?s risk-taking behavior she believes? Is her essay slanted in favor of one opinion or another, either in terms of her examples or her language?

f.   Should a reporter be neutral? Isn?t the selection of evidence in itself a form of tipping the scale in favor of one side or another?

2. Read ” The Declaration of Independence” in the attachments.

Answer Question a-f each question’s solution each paragraph (total 6 paragraph)

Don’t summary the essay, just focus on each question

a What are ? the Law of Nature and of Nature?s God? to which Jefferson refers in paragraph 1? Why doesn?t he specify what they are? Is a brief allusion to them in the first paragraph sufficient support for the fundamental premise of the second paragraph?

b. What is Jefferson?s fundamental premise? Does he ever prove it? Does he need to?

c. In paragraphs 3-31 the Declaration states a series of the American colonists? grievances against the British King, Geories III.What are some of these grievances? Can they be grouped into categories related to the ?unalienable rights? Jefferson has specified at the outset, the rights to ?Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness?
Click here to get this or any other assignment done for you at profoundessaywriters.com

d. From the nature of the grievances Jefferson identifies, what ideal of government does he have in mind? Can such a government exist among colonial peoples, or only in an independent nation?

e. Could the American colonists have expected the British simply to agree that separation had become necessary? Or is ? The Declaration of Independence? in effect a declaration of war? How does the inclusion appear to be the inevitable consequence of the reasoning that precedes it? Are there any feasible alternatives? How do Jefferson?s choice of words(semantics) and sentence structure (syntax) imply that separation is the inevitable effect of the king?s actions?

f. Why has Jefferson listed the grievances in the order in which they appear?

3.Read “Under the Influence: Paying the price of My Father’s Booze” in the attachments.

Answer Question a-f each question’s solution need in each paragraph (total 6 paragraph)

Don’t summary the essay, just focus on each question

a.This essay abounds in examples of alcoholism. Which examples are the most memorable? Are these also the most painful? The most powerful? Explain why.

b. Sanders says that in spite of all his ? grown-up knowledge? of alcoholism, ? Iam still ten years old, my own son?s age? (8),as he writes this essay. What does he mean by this? What kind of a character is Sanders in this essay? What kind of a character is his father? Is there any resemblance between father and son?

c. Is Sander writing for alcoholic readers? Their families? People unfamiliar with the symptoms of alcoholism? Or is he writing mostly for himself, to try to come to terms with the effects of his father?s alcoholism on him then and now?

d. Each section of this essay(paragraph 1-8, 9-14, 15-24, 25-31, 32-36, 37-44, 45-52, 53-55) focus on a different sort of example. What are they, and why are they arranged in this particular order?

e. Why does Sanders wait until late in the essay (39) to discuss his father?s sobriety, and then devote only three paragraphs to a state that lasted fifteen years?

f. What is the to this essay? How does Sanders, one of the victims of alcoholism as both a child and an adult, avoid being dull of self-pity? Is he angry at his father? How can you tell?

Leave a Reply